Uncategorized

Natural Medicine: Balacing yin and yang to treat hot flashes

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

Hot flashes are commonly experienced during menopause. They can begin as a momentary sensation of mild to intense warmth that spreads throughout the body. This often is followed by flushing of the skin, perspiration and finally a cold, clammy sensation. Hot flashes also can be preceded or accompanied by weakness, nausea, dizziness, faintness, headache, anxiety or rapid heartbeat. This experience can be difficult and uncomfortable, and often disrupts sleep at night.

According to Western medicine, hot flashes primarily are caused by hormonal changes, particularly a decrease in estrogen. The drop in estrogen tricks the temperature center in the brain into thinking the body temperature is too high, so the body cools by venting heat and sweating.
One form of treatment involves hormone replacement therapy, which presents unwanted risks and side effects.

In contrast, traditional Chinese medicine attributes the cause of hot flashes to an imbalance of yin and yang, where yin is cooling and water, while yang is warming and fire. In menopause, a decrease in cooling yin leads to an imbalance in which warming yang loses its counterbalance and breaks free, flaring up causing hot flashes.

Herbal remedies can be quite effective in treating hot flashes. One formula traditionally used to treat hot flashes, for example, focuses on building the yin while cooling the yang. In fact, this formula was shown to have a significant effect on the hormone imbalance that occurs in menopause, increasing estrogen levels by 20 percent after two months of use.
It is important to note that every woman experiences menopause uniquely. Symptoms vary in severity, duration and frequency. If you are interested in using Chinese herbal medicine to minimize discomfort during menopause, seek a licensed and experienced acupuncture and Oriental medicine practitioner.
– Donah I. Natividad, M.S., L.A.c., acupuncture and Oriental medicine resident, Bastyr Center for Natural Health

Confusion Over Hormone Replacement Therapy

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

Women are confused, and can you blame them? Ever since the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) has become an extremely controversial topic, especially since a lot of physicians themselves have a problem explaining the results.

Dr. Judi Goldstone at Griffin Medical Group recently sat down and answered questions on the subject of bio-identical hormone replacement for women. Dr. Goldstone is an expert on the subject and these are comments to questions that were submitted to her blog.
Dr. Goldstone is a board certified internal medicine specialist and Director of the Age Management program at Griffin Medical Group. Dr. Goldstone is also an active member of the American Society of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M).
Question: What is the theory behind bio-identical hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women?Dr. Goldstone: When it comes to disease, conventional medicine will restore of low levels of thyroid, insulin and cortisol. This would be the standard and typical medical treatment. Thus, it seems logical to also replace estrogen, progesterone, testosterone growth hormone when a person has low levels of those hormones. However, the evidence leaves clinicians at a loss for clear direction, because different studies, using a variety of types of hormones, methods of hormone administration, and women of different ages, have produced conflicting results.

Question: What are the Normal Hormone Ratios?

Dr. Goldstone: There are three predominant estrogens in non-pregnant, pre-menopausal women: estrone (E1), estradiol (E2) and estriol (E3). These naturally occur in different relative amounts. Typically, E1 will make up 10 to 20 percent of total estrogen, E2 will make up another 10 to 20 percent and E3 will comprise the remaining 60 to 80 percent of total estrogen.
This ratio is protective, because the bulk of estrogen is comprised by the weakest estrogen, E3, which is also the most protective against blood clots and breast cancer. E2 is the strongest estrogen, and E1 is the storage form of estrogen.
E1 is sometimes considered the “least desirable” estrogen, because it can stimulate breast tissue production and blood clots. E1 can be metabolized and excreted by the liver, but if the liver systems are overwhelmed or if vitamins B12 and folic acid are deficient, E1 is converted to quinines. These can be mutagenic and carcinogenic, and thus could ultimately lead to cancer and other health problems.Question: What are bio-identical hormones and how can they mimic protective ratios?
Dr. Goldstone: Estrogen-like hormones can be obtained from horses, soy and yams, but these hormones do not fit exactly into the human receptors. By contrast, bio-identical hormones are an exact match, molecule for molecule, to the hormones produced naturally by a woman’s body.

They fit the hormone receptor just like a key fits into its lock, and the body cannot distinguish between a bio-identical hormone and the hormones it makes itself.Bio-identical hormones can be made in several ways.
Sometimes they are created by modifying soy or yam — any molecule that does not exist on the human hormone counterpart is removed. They are produced synthetically in the laboratory to make bio-identical estrogen, testosterone and progesterone transdermal creams and gels.Question: How are bio-identical hormones prescribed by doctors who use them today?
Dr. Goldstone: The goal is to re-establish the normal protective ratio, a 20:80 ratio of E2 to E3, and avoid E1 altogether. This formula is called Bi-est. Estrogen that comes in the form of a transdermal cream mimics normal ratios better than estrogen that is taken in pill form, because the estrogen pill first has to pass through the liver, where 50 percent is converted into E1 (“bad” estrogen) before being circulated to tissues.
Estrogen applied through a transdermal cream enters the blood at the same ratio in which it is applied to the skin, with no chance for alteration by the liver. Many studies suggest that estrogen administered through a transdermal cream decreases thrombosis, blood pressure, triglycerides and vascular resistance, as opposed to the pill form of estrogen, which is known to increase these effects and can also cause other problems.

Question: Hormone replacement studies have raised questions about the health risks associated with traditional menopause treatment, what has happened since then?
Dr. Goldstone: The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) was a large study, sponsored by the National Institute of Health, which greatly influenced how American doctors prescribe hormones and how American women receive them. Millions of women stopped hormone replacement therapy (HRT) because of the study’s findings.

But, as with any medical study, there were many problems. The researchers did not take “quality of life” into account. They did not use estrogens in favorable ratios and they did not test hormones that were administered via a transdermal cream.
The estrogen used by women in the study was a synthetic, non bio-identical and oral conjugated estrogen from a pregnant mare’s urine called Premarin, which is known to increase the risk of thrombosis and cancer. The study also used the oral estrogen mentioned above combined with progestin, which is a synthetic and non bio-identical progesterone and this to can increase the risk cardiovascular disease and cancer.
Another problem with the study was the age of the women involved. The researchers should have started women on hormone therapy before they developed significant vascular disease, by age 55, instead of at an average age of 63 and higher.
Finally, the researchers should have insisted on media coverage of some of the positive findings they later discovered in their data analysis. Since that study, many American women and their doctors have found an alternative treatment via the bio-identical hormone approach.
Unfortunately, there are no studies on bio-identical hormones comparable to the size of the WHI study available yet. While there is no question that more studies on bio-identical hormone therapies are needed, a large body of evidence points to the potential advantages of the bio-identical approach.


What you need to know about Plastic Bottles

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

Did you ever drink from a plastic bottle and see a triangle symbol on the bottom with a number inside? Do you know what the number stands for? Did you guess that it’s just for recycling?

Then you are WRONG !!!!!! THE NUMBER TELLS YOU THE CHEMICAL MAKE UP OF THE PLASTIC…..

1) Polyethylene terephalate (PET)
2) High density polyethylene (HDPE)
3) Unplasticised polyvinyl chloride (UPVC) or Plasticised polyvinyl chloride (PPVC)
4) Low density polyethylene LDPE
5) Polypropylene (PP)
6) Polystyrene (PS) or Expandable polystyrene (EPS)
7) Other, including nylon and acrylic
What you aren’t told is that many of the plastics used are toxic and the chemicals used to create a plastic can leach out of the plastic and into the food / drink. Think about it, how many times have you or a friend said ‘I don’t like this, it taste like the plastic bottle ….. ‘

THAT’S BECAUSE YOU ARE TASTING THE PLASTIC The WORST ONES are Nos: 3, 6, and 7 !!! DO NOT USE THESE NUMBERS if stated at the bottom of the bottle) !!! Check out this chart that breaks down the plastic, its uses and chemical makeup (I find #7 a little scary) http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/waste/guide_ref/guide_plascod3.html

Reusing plastic bottles by refilling them is NOT a good idea. WATCH THIS VIDEO: http://video.wnbc.com/player/?id=238518

Microwaving plastic containers affects the chemical make up of the plastic, allowing the chemical substances to destabilize and leach out more quickly into the food you are reheating. You can check out this article that ran in the Wall Street Journal:
http://www.mindfully.org/Plastic/Microwave-Health-Problems.htm

EVEN one of my favorite ‘RUMOR DEBUNKING’ websites, URBANLEGENDS.ABOUT.COM Lists the information as: overblown with a grain of TRUTH READ the FULL 3 pages of the article! http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl-microwave-dioxin.htm

AVOID re-using plastic bottles RIGHT AWAY

Source: http://www.griffinmedical.com/


A Conversation with David T. Zava, Ph.D.

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

During his life, Dr. Lee published numerous interviews with experts in the field of natural hormone balance. This includes the following interview with Dr. David Zava, the founder of ZRT Laboratory and a co-author with Dr. Lee of What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Breast Cancer. In the interview, Dr. Zava explains that women who are diagnosed with breast cancer often have a distinct set of hormonal imbalances which he calls “the breast cancer profile”.

Read this article »


THERE’S A RAY OF HOPE OUT OF THE NATION’S CAPITAL

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

A resolution pending before Congress calls for the re-engineering of the nation’s healthcare system with a focus on natural health and wellness.

At the request of the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians (AANP), R.I. Congressman Jim Langevin has introduced a resolution calling for the re-engineering of our healthcare system. The resolution contains the following compelling statement:

“[T]here is a growing body of evidence that wellness programs that promote lifestyle changes can diminish the incidence and severity of chronic disease, provide a substantial return on investment, and reduce reliance on the conventional medical care system.”

The resolution also contains the following equally compelling mandate:

“[T]he Federal Government has a responsibility to reengineer the Nation’s healthcare system to allow for the provision of adequate healthcare for future generations.”

The resolution goes on to require that the re-engineering effort include a primary focus on wellness and natural health principles.

AANP Executive Director Karen Howard shared these thoughts with us:

“The importance of the message contained in this Resolution cannot be underestimated. Not one health care reform conversation to date has taken on the challenge of transforming our disease management system to one built on the foundation of being well. In other words, all current health care reform proposals on the table are destined to further bankrupt society and the health of future generations. Congressman Langevin’s resolution is the start of a new, and essential conversation.”

Read more about H. Con. Res. 406 at www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hc110-406